Let's Talk Legal: The Elective Share

March 31, 2026 | Wesley Collins

The discussion focused on North Carolina’s elective share law and how it protects a surviving spouse in second or later marriages when estate plans are not updated. The speakers explained that a surviving spouse can usually file a claim within six months of the estate opening, with the share increasing based on the length of the marriage, and noted that the claim can include both probate and non-probate assets. They emphasized the importance of planning tools such as trusts, prenuptial or postnuptial agreements, and timely legal advice to reduce conflict and avoid lengthy estate litigation.

Elective Share and Remarriage Planning

Why elective share matters

The discussion opened with the idea that elective share is an important but often misunderstood legal concept affecting surviving spouses, especially in modern families with remarriages and blended households. The speakers emphasized that marriage creates significant legal rights and obligations, including tax, inheritance, and incapacity consequences, and that failure to plan after remarriage can create major problems. [00:48] [02:11] [03:14]

Marriage as a legal contract

The speakers explained that marriage is not only a personal or religious commitment but also a legal contract. Because of that contract, legal rights and obligations attach automatically, though some can be altered through planning and legal advice. They stressed that people should understand these consequences before or soon after remarriage. [05:20] [05:49] [06:25]

What the elective share is

The elective share was described as a statutory right available only to a legally married surviving spouse. If the decedent’s estate plan tries to leave less to the spouse than the statute allows, the surviving spouse may elect to claim a share of the estate instead. The speakers noted that this right does not exist for unmarried partners. [06:33] [04:41]

Filing deadline and percentage based on length of marriage

A surviving spouse must file an elective share claim within six months after the estate is opened. Missing that deadline waives the right entirely. The amount recoverable depends on the length of the marriage: 15% within the first five years, 25% between five and ten years, 33% between ten and fifteen years, and 50% after fifteen years. [06:33] [04:41] [11:xx]

Assets included in the calculation

The speakers explained that the elective share is broad and can include much more than cash or real estate. It may reach retirement accounts, investments, life insurance, and other non-probate assets that pass outside the estate. Because of this, the estate representative must disclose all assets so the share can be calculated accurately. [10:00] [11:xx] [12:xx]

Disclosure, discovery, and attorney’s fees

After a claim is filed, the executor or estate representative must disclose asset information to the spouse making the claim. If the information is withheld, the surviving spouse can use discovery and may recover attorney’s fees and costs. The process may require hearings and court involvement before the elective share is formally determined and ordered. [11:xx] [13:12] [13:49]

Why blended families create disputes

Much of the conversation focused on second and third marriages, especially where each spouse has children from prior relationships. The speakers described common scenarios where spouses intend to leave assets to each other first and then to all children equally, but later changes in documents, beneficiary designations, illness, or family pressure can upset that understanding and trigger elective share disputes. [08:xx] [09:24] [16:xx]

Separation is not the same as divorce

The program addressed the common misconception that long separation ends marital rights. The speakers clarified that if a couple is still legally married, the surviving spouse may still seek an elective share even if they have lived apart for years. Divorce, however, ends elective share rights entirely. [18:18] [19:00] [20:52] [22:03]

Possible defense: abandonment

The estate can raise abandonment as a defense if the surviving spouse failed to stay with or support the deceased spouse, especially in illness or hardship. The speakers noted that abandonment is fact-specific and could become a jury issue. Merely living separately or having a strained relationship does not necessarily equal abandonment. [19:04] [19:20] [20:20]

Planning tools to reduce risk

To avoid harsh results, the speakers described planning tools such as trusts that provide for a surviving spouse during life but preserve assets for children from a prior marriage after the spouse’s death. They also mentioned post-nuptial agreements as another option, though these are more complex because they require independent legal advice and adequate consideration. [23:45] [25:05]

Broader lesson: get legal advice early

The main takeaway was that remarriage, especially later in life or in blended families, should prompt immediate estate planning. The speakers urged listeners to seek legal advice before remarriage, shortly after marriage, or whenever family circumstances change, to avoid costly litigation and unintended results. [03:24] [26:05] [27:03]

Illustrative case examples

Several examples were used to show how real these issues can be. One spouse ultimately recovered more than half a million dollars through a successful elective share claim. Another example involved an elderly man who had remarried recently and was already thinking about the legal effects of that marriage. These stories were used to show how elective share issues can arise even in unexpected situations. [17:51] [26:19]

Closing emphasis

The segment closed by reinforcing that Harvell & Collins handles estate-related issues and that listeners of any age should think ahead about legal planning. The speakers framed elective share as one of the most powerful but least understood protections for surviving spouses. [27:58] [28:46]

Listen Now
Let's Talk Legal: The Elective Share
Wesley A. Collins Martindale AV Rated
About the Author
Wesley A. Collins is AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated. Wesley A. Collins is a native of Kinston, North Carolina and was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 2000. Mr. Collins was admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in 2002. Mr. Collins is also a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum. Read More

Cecil S. Harvell Martindale AV Rated
Cecil S. Harvell is AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated in the areas of Trusts and Estates, General Practice, and Aged and Aging. Mr. Harvell is a native of Morehead City, North Carolina and was admitted to the Georgia State Bar in 1983 and admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 1987. Inducted to The Order of the Long Leaf Pine. Read More
Let's Talk Legal
See How Our Team Can Help You
GET IN TOUCH