Let's Talk Legal: Default Judgments

January 27, 2026 | Wesley Collins

The hosts discussed the consequences of ignoring a civil summons and complaint, explaining that failure to respond can lead to an entry of default (an admission of the complaint’s allegations) and ultimately a default judgment enforceable like any final judgment. They emphasized acting quickly—filing an answer to preserve defenses such as statutes of limitations, seeking counsel immediately to set aside defaults or judgments if served, and monitoring service and notice details (especially for elderly or relocated individuals). Practical examples were given illustrating how procedural technicalities and timely responses affect the ability to set aside judgments and the prospects for settlement.

Summons and Failure to Respond

Overview: Importance of Prompt Response

  • Emphasis that receiving a summons and complaint requires immediate attention and legal counsel to avoid costly consequences and unexpected events. [00:00]

How Summons/Complaint Are Delivered and What They Mean

  • Summons often attached to the complaint (commonly a yellow sheet) notifying the defendant of a civil action; typical response deadlines are 30 days for state court and 20 days for federal court. [02:29]

  • Various types of civil complaints (money owed, family/property disputes, mistaken identity, company misnaming). [02:29]

Entry of Default: Procedure and Legal Effect

  • If a defendant does not respond within the prescribed time, the plaintiff may seek an entry of default; the clerk verifies service and enters the default if appropriate. [04:04]

  • Entry of default is a paper determination that functions as an admission of all allegations in the complaint. [04:47] [05:46]

Default Judgment: Next Step and Variations

  • After entry of default, plaintiff can seek a default judgment. If the complaint states a “sum certain” (specific amount or calculable periodic amount), the clerk can enter judgment without a hearing. [09:58] [11:04]

  • If damages are not a sum certain, plaintiff must present evidence at a hearing (affidavits, testimony) for the court to calculate damages before entering judgment. [11:04] [11:48]

Difficulty of Setting Aside Default or Default Judgment

  • Early action increases likelihood of getting an entry of default set aside; the longer the case proceeds (discovery, depositions, trial preparation), the harder it becomes. [07:45] [09:12]

  • Courts are often reluctant to set aside defaults/default judgments; defendants must present strong evidence and persuasive reasons for relief. [12:46] [14:05]

Examples and Case Illustrations

  • Case where corporate defendant passed service to internal/legal/insurance channels but court declined to set aside default judgment because of insufficient follow-up. Court emphasized defendants’ duty to ensure proper handling. [12:46] [14:05]

  • Example of a debtor with a >$1M default judgment later shown to likely owe a much smaller amount; the judgment was set aside on technical service-notice defects (mail timing/mail-back box rule). This highlights hyper-technical defenses and the need for timely action. [19:20] [20:09]

Practical Consequences of an Unresolved Judgment

  • After entry of judgment, creditors can pursue execution remedies such as sheriff’s levy and sale of real property; failure to set aside judgment leads to enforceable collection actions. [21:11]

Service Nuances and Defenses

  • Common service methods: personal service by sheriff, certified mail/restricted delivery, or service at residence to a person of suitable age and discretion. [25:18] [26:57]

  • When service is to a “person of suitable age and discretion,” courts examine household mail-handling practices and whether the defendant actually received notice (factors include where mail is placed and routine processing). [26:57] [28:09]

Responding to a Complaint: The Answer and Affirmative Defenses

  • The initial responsive pleading is an Answer: it admits/denies allegations or states lack of sufficient information and raises affirmative defenses. [28:34] [28:56]

  • Affirmative defenses (statute of limitations, statute of frauds, etc.) must be timely raised; failure to plead them in the answer can waive those defenses (example: 3-year statute of limitations for contract claims). [28:56] [30:38]

Settlement Considerations

  • Settlement prospects decline significantly after entry of default or default judgment because the plaintiff’s litigation costs to obtain relief are reduced and the defendant’s negotiating leverage weakens. Early engagement increases likelihood of favorable settlement. [31:46] [33:18]

Special Considerations for Elderly or Incapacitated Defendants

  • Courts may consider diminished capacity (with supporting evidence such as affidavits from a physician) as a factor when deciding whether to set aside a default or judgment, particularly when service/receipt issues involve elderly individuals. [23:49] [24:41]

  • If a person has a legally appointed guardian, proper service must be made on the guardian rather than the incapacitated individual. [23:49]

Practical Advice / Takeaway

  • Immediate action: contact competent counsel upon receiving a summons; attorneys will prioritize checking for entry of default or default judgment and act to set them aside before addressing merits. [16:42] [17:24]

  • Monitor mail and service addresses closely; update addresses with the court and follow up with insurers or corporate legal departments to ensure responsive pleadings are filed. [15:22] [19:20]

  • Timing is critical; small procedural defects can be decisive but require prompt identification and litigation response. [19:20] [20:09]

Listen Now
Let's Talk Legal: Default Judgments
Wesley A. Collins Martindale AV Rated
About the Author
Wesley A. Collins is AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated. Wesley A. Collins is a native of Kinston, North Carolina and was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 2000. Mr. Collins was admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in 2002. Mr. Collins is also a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum. Read More

Cecil S. Harvell Martindale AV Rated
Cecil S. Harvell is AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated in the areas of Trusts and Estates, General Practice, and Aged and Aging. Mr. Harvell is a native of Morehead City, North Carolina and was admitted to the Georgia State Bar in 1983 and admitted to the North Carolina State Bar in 1987. Inducted to The Order of the Long Leaf Pine. Read More
Let's Talk Legal
See How Our Team Can Help You
GET IN TOUCH